|
A Tale of Two Lectures
Michael Williams ‘04
March 19 and 20, Villanova’s Ethics
Program and the Center for Peace and Justice Education jointly sponsored
two speaking engagements by Dr. Jeffrey Stout from Princeton University’s
department of religion.
The first lecture was titled “Jocks and Nerds: Origins and Consequences
of the Student-Athlete Ideal.” This the final lecture of the 2002-2003
Ethics Program lecture series on ethics and popular culture, explored
the labels and social circles that form in our society as a result of
attention to academics and or athletics. Social cliques are an important
part of our society. Beside the basic family unit, cliques and their associated
labels are the most readily available way of classifying people in society.
According to Dr. Stout, the opposition of so-called “jocks”
and “nerds” found its roots in the university setting where
each group was rewarded differently for their abilities.
The second lecture, “Virtue and the Way of the World: Reflections
on Hauerwas,” is a journey into the debate over the relation between
theology and public discourse. According to Stout, Stanley Hauerwas “is
surely the most prolific and influential theologian working in the United
States.” After this commentary, it is interesting to find that the
main contention of Stout’s lecture was in disagreement with Hauerwas’
assertions.
In the introduction of his most recent book, A Better Hope, Hauerwas confesses
that he has “grown tired of arguments about the alleged virtues
or vices of liberalism.” Stout contends that “this is understandable,
because he has argued against the vices of liberalism countless times
in the last two decades. During that period the principal targets of his
criticism have been 20th century theologians who dedicated themselves
to social justice and sought to make the church safe for democratic aspirations.”
According to Stout, “the main effect of his [Hauerwas] anti-liberal
rhetoric, aside from significantly widening his audience, has been to
undercut Christian identification with democracy.”
|
|