Villanova University
VU Links
Blueprints Archive Log on  
Office of Communication & Public Affairs

 

Blueprints - March 2005 Edition

Our Partners

Dr. Michelle Moravec speaks on feminist art
By Kimberly Wallmeier '06

   On Jan. 31, Villanova University’s department of women’s studies hosted Michelle Moravec, who has a doctorate in U.S. History, for a lecture titled “Protest, Propaganda and Provocations: Feminist Art and Violence Against Women.” She recounted the early efforts of the Women’s Building in Los Angeles, CA, which sought to promote collaboration and networking of the many disparate women’s rights groups across the country. Moravec, now a history professor at Rosemont College, began her involvement with the Women’s Building in 1991 when she was hired to take an oral history of the Los Angeles, Calif. center upon its dissolution. She presented the work of two performance artists, Suzanne Lacy and Leslie Lebowitz.

   Lacy and Lebowitz took their art “to the people” in a way that was immediately legible and had the ability to raise consciousness, engage the viewer and transform one’s opinion. Moravec presented three of Lacy and Lebowitz’s more memorable pieces: “3 Weeks in May,” “Record Companies Drag the Feet” and “In Mourning and in Rage.”

   “3 Weeks in May” in May 1977, sought to address the issue of violence against women and to change the mindset that a woman was somehow to blame for acts of violence against her. The defined goals of this piece were threefold: protest media sensationalism of rape, replace the negative female image with one of empowerment, bring together anti-rape organizations available to Los Angeles women.

   In “Record Companies Drag the Feet,” Lacy and Lebowitz were targeting misogynistic images in the music industry in bands such as The Rolling Stones and Kiss. They believed that “images of violence against women actually helped to create acts of violence.” Lacy and Lebowitz organized a boycott of certain record companies and staged a protest at the base of a Kiss billboard on Sunset Ave. Their strategy included using simple images, bold text, a one-angle shot for photographers, and a press conference to reinforce their message.

   The final piece presented by Moravec, “In Mourning and in Rage,” was organized as a response to the media coverage of Los Angeles’ Hillside Strangler. The coverage of these murders sensationalized the fact that the victims were all prostitutes. Lacy and Lebowitz responded with a demonstration at City Hall in Dec. 1977. The demonstration sought to prove that these acts of violence could happen to any woman, regardless of profession, race, age or sexual experience. They demanded the city provide free self-defense classes, include a rape hotline number in the emergency section of the phonebook, and use the reward money for the strangler’s capture to provide services for violence against women. All of these demands were met.

   Moravec concluded her lecture by asking the audience to consider whether they would want their name published if they were the victim of a sexual assault. Currently, there is a gentleman’s agreement in the media not to disclose the victim’s name. Moravec wants to know why. If we truly believe that there is no blame on the victim, then why do most women say they would not want their name published? Moravec hypothesized that this proves we still place some blame on the rape victim for the violent acts committed against them.

   For more information on the Women’s Building visit www.womensbuilding.org. Moravec is currently researching virtual communities for pregnant women and mothers.

Contact Webmaster
Last Modified: Fri Jul 29 12:31:57 GMT-05:00 2005
Privacy Statement
© Copyright 2005 Villanova University